asfenshirts.blogg.se

Mathstudio scripting language comparison
Mathstudio scripting language comparison





mathstudio scripting language comparison

In Firefox, demonstrated on large game enginesĪsm.js optimizations shipping or under development inĪdobe, AutoDesk, Epic, Facebook, Mega, Unity, and more shipping with Emscripten/asm.jsĪsm.js use today demonstrates real demand and excitement Published asm.js subset, shipped optimizations

mathstudio scripting language comparison

Why do we need this new target / feature / CPU / asm.js++? Short History of asm.js 2009 - 2012Įmscripten: C/C++ to JS compiler/toolchain Languages like C/C++ and shipped on the Web today)Ĭan think of WebAssembly as a binary encoding of asm.js with tweaks to make it a better compiler target asm.js Low-level subset of JavaScript that can be compiled from (tl dr - asm.js is an extraordinarily optimizable, Virtual CPUĪs close to physical machine instructions as safety/portability allow WebAssembly Compiler Target for the WebĬompile from programming languages 2. It's a couple things, depending on what you're doing: 1. Group with Apple, Google, Microsoft and Mozilla which Luke Wagner / Co-chair WebAssembly W3C Community Group) OutlineĪ new standard being developed in a W3C Community Virtual worlds content scripting and animationĭe facto reference is the Second Life implementation of LSL.WebAssembly (Do we all have to learn C now?) Several variants, custom programmable, dynamic loadable modulesĪpplication, industrial instrumentation-automation Multiple dispatch, meta, scalar and array-oriented, parallel, concurrent, distributed ("cloud")Īpplication, mobile development, server-side, client-side, webĭe facto standard via Kotlin Language Specification

MATHSTUDIO SCRIPTING LANGUAGE COMPARISON ISO

General, application, business, client-side, server-side, web (EWF)Īrray-based, vectorized, concurrent, native distributed/shared-memory parallelismġ966, ANSI 66, ANSI 77, MIL-STD-1753, ISO 90, ISO 95, ISO 2003, ISO/IEC 1539-1:2010 (2008), ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N2145 (2018)ĭe facto standard via Go Language SpecificationĪpplication, business, data processing, general, webĪrray-oriented, function-level, tacit, concurrentĪpplication, business, client-side, general, mobile development, server-side, webĭe facto standard via Java Language Specification Standard via Ballerina Language Specification Īpplication, system, general purpose, low-level operationsġ989, ANSI C89, ISO C90, ISO C99, ISO C11, ISO C18 ġ998, ISO/IEC 2003, ISO/IEC 2011,ISO/IEC 2014,ISO/IEC 2017 Īpplication, RAD, business, client-side, general, server-side, web, game programmingġ968 ANSI X3.23, 1974, 1985 ISO/IEC 1989:1985, 2002, 2014Įxtensible syntax, Array-oriented, syntactic macros, multiple dispatch, concurrentĭe facto standard via Curry Language ReportĪpplication, general, numerical computingĪpplication, web, server-side, mobile, IoT GUI automation (macros), highly domain-specificĬoncurrent, transactional, statically and strongly typed programming, diagrammatic / visual programming GUI automation ( macros), highly domain-specific Highly domain-specific, symbolic computingĪny, syntax is usually highly specific, related to the target processor See the individual languages' articles for further information.Īpplication, RAD, business, general, web, mobile The following table compares general and technical information for a selection of commonly used programming languages.







Mathstudio scripting language comparison